I was walking from a meeting near Union Square back to Penn Station. It was a chilly day, and I was energized because I was looking forward to stopping at one of my favorite food spots, Eatily, to get a cannoli for the ride home. Yum.
But, on Broadway's crowded sidewalk, I had my expressionless "walking face" on, as did everyone else. I found myself keeping up a brisk pace behind a tall, young woman, whose "look" could not escape my attention. Her height was enhanced by high-heeled, thigh-high boots. She wore a short, short mini skirt, and a short red leather jacket. She had un-natural red hair that was straight and cut in a severe bob. It was probably a wig. She wore huge hoop earrings. I never did see her face, but I'm sure she was wearing lots of makeup and maybe even false eyelashes! I felt short and funny behind her, carrying my over-sized bag and wearing flat shoes and conservative clothing.
To our right, there was a man handing out flyers. You've seen the type. They, too, always keep a straight face. They often make a noise with their papers to get you to look at them, and then they try to give you whatever it is they are handing out. I've mastered the art of saying, "No, thank you," without breaking my stride. At least I'm polite and don't ignore them, as most New Yorkers do! The woman in front of me ignored this man. When it was my turn, I said my, "No, thank you," but then locked eyes with him and smiled. He was going to move on, stone-faced, to try to hand a flyer to the next person, but first, he quickly and broadly smiled back at me. Without uttering a word, it was our way of saying, "Get a load of HER!"
I smiled all the way to Eatily, and then on to Penn Station. That moment made my day, even more than the cannoli. I love New York.
Tuesday, December 1, 2015
Monday, November 23, 2015
The Book Club Boogie
Several years ago, a neighbor and friend
told me that there was an opening in her book club, and she was pleased to be
able to ask me if I would like to join. They
carefully monitor the number of members, not wanting the group to get too
large. She had previously told me about
this exclusive club, which was founded and organized by a high-profile intellectual/personality in the elite college town that we live in. What
makes this club special is that the author of the book to be discussed always
attends the meeting. One time, the
assigned book was by Steve Martin, and yes, Steve Martin himself was at that
meeting.
My friend told me that she thought I would
enjoy participating in the club, but she warned me that it was a fairly serious
commitment. The founder gets angry if
you miss a meeting. Members are expected
to complete the books on time and be at all the meetings. After all, a great deal of effort is put into
getting the authors there.
I didn’t have to think about it long. I responded that, as much as I appreciated
the invitation, I would have to pass.
Between work and childcare, I didn’t have a lot of time left to
read. And when I did read, I’d rather be
able to choose my own books and read them at my leisure, without a
deadline. Sure, it’s sexy to meet some
really great authors, but a group where the founder routinely gets angry at
members is not where I’d like to spend my time.
I have enough challenges.
I really enjoy reading, or listening to
audio books, as I’ve been doing more and more lately. Non-fiction is my
favorite, although the occasional novel slips in. I also enjoy talking with friends about books
I’ve read. At a party about a year ago,
I was chatting up some books with an acquaintance, and a few weeks later, she
emailed me to invite me to join her book club.
She said that it was a really laid-back group that meets only every six
weeks, and that they read only fiction, to keep the atmosphere light.
You don’t have to attend every meeting, and you don’t even have to have
finished the book to come to the gatherings, which members take turns hosting
at 9pm, after the kids are asleep. “Ok,”
I thought, “I could swing that, as long as most of the books are available on
audio,” which turned out not to be a problem.
At the first meeting, I admit to feeling a
little intimidated, as several of the members taught at our prestigious local university. Luckily, the others didn’t, so I was comforted by the fact that I wasn’t alone. I enjoyed
the conversation and the society, so it seemed like a good match.
Further down the road, we read and
discussed, upon my recommendation, “Loving Frank,” by Nancy Horan, a based-on-truth
novel about Frank Lloyd Wright and Mamah Borthwick Cheney, the woman for whom
the famed architect scandalously left his wife and six children. I like historical fiction as a second choice to non-fiction, and have long admired the work of Frank Lloyd Wright. Spoiler alert: The end of the book describes
how, in 1914, Mamah and her two children were murdered by a disturbed black man
from Barbados, Julian Carlton, who was in the service of the unmarried couple
in their home in rural Wisconsin. Most
of the people in the book club weren’t crazy about the book, but it did spark
some lively conversation. One woman, a
teacher at an area public university, expressed her shock and scorn for the author,
who ignored how Carlton must have felt as a black man living in isolation and
service. I was surprised by this
reaction, because the book wasn’t about Carlton, it was about the relationship
between Wright and Chaney. Carlton’s emotional
backstory never even entered my mind.
This should have been a hint to me about
this particular club member’s feelings about race relations, but I missed
it. A few meetings later, we discussed “Americanah,”
a really great book by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, about a young woman from
Nigeria who leaves her home and boyfriend to come to the US and attend
the private university in our town. (I highly
recommend it!)
Now, after the fact, a friend of mine told
me, “Don’t you know to avoid talking about race, politics and religion at all
cost?” But anyone who knows me knows
that I believe in open dialogue about all subjects. Sometimes, the more sensitive, the better.
The public university teacher told the group about the
struggle some of her students have in writing in what is generally accepted as “proper”
English. She explained that she is
careful not to discourage her students from writing by being too critical,
although often some students write like they speak, in broken English, in
street vernacular, or in “Ebonics.” She
tries not to “over-correct” their papers for fear of discouraging them.
As a perpetual student of French, I
appreciate it when someone corrects a grammatical or pronunciation mistake I
make. People more often than not don’t,
for fear of offending me, but I wish more people would. But not everyone is me. Still, I told the story of how, at a street
fair a couple of weeks prior to the meeting, I was talking with two young teens
from the black Baptist church I attend.
I was scheduled to perform with the church choir that afternoon. One of the girls asked, “Where you singin’
at?” I looked at her and said, “Excuse
me?” in a playful way. The other girl
nudged her and said, “Where are you singing?”
The first girl got the message, so she repeated, “Where are you singing?”
I answered her question, but I could
tell she was annoyed by my prompting her to use proper English. Well, the public university teacher was appalled. She berated me, saying, “You mean to tell us
that this young person let you into her world and spoke to you like a peer, and
you corrected her, right there in the middle of the street fair?” I said, “Yes, I corrected her as I would have
corrected one of my own children. We are
members of the same church family, but I am not her peer. I am her elder.” She said, “I don’t think you would have
corrected your own child like that.” I
said, “I most certainly would have. You
don’t even know me!” Anyway, it wasn't pleasant, but somehow we
got past the scrape, and at the end of the meeting, we agreed on the next book.
Five weeks passed, I finished the book, but
I hadn’t heard where the next meeting would be.
I offered to host it, since I had yet to host a meeting. I had no response. Finally, the morning of the meeting, I got a
call from my friend who had invited me to be in the group. She said, “Some of the members are super
uncomfortable with the disagreement you both had at the last meeting, and they
asked me to tell you that they would rather you not continue participating in
the group.”
Here I was, worried that I wouldn’t be up
to snuff with some of the intellectuals in the group, and now I was being told
that if there is a difference of opinion, better keep it to yourself. My friend said, “We should just chalk it up
to a bad match. You know I respect you
very much, which is why I invited you to participate in the first place, and I’m
really sorry about this.” I was stunned,
hurt, and disappointed. I had made
friends with some of the people in the group.
To this day, no one has been in touch with me. I even Facebook messaged a couple of members
from time to time to say, “Hi,” but no one wrote back. The level of immaturity and cowardice is
stunning from a group of highly-educated and presumably civic-minded individuals.
I was ashamed of having been kicked out of
an elite college town book club for many months.
Then, as time distanced me from the bitter experience, I was finally
able to talk about it, albeit cautiously.
I told the story to one close friend, who howled with laughter. “I always thought you were a cool person, but
this seals the deal! You were kicked out
of a snooty book club!
Awesome! You should be proud of
yourself for standing up for what you believe in!” she said. I feel a lot better now.
Thursday, November 19, 2015
"Ew"
I was sound asleep. I remember feeling warm and comfortable under my feather duvet. Unconscious. It was nice.
Then, I felt a light tap on my shoulder, and I heard my daughter, in her little girl voice, say, "Ew." Before I even opened my eyes, I knew that "Ew" could only mean one thing: she made a messy caca in her pullup.
What time is it? I squinted to see my clock. 5am. I forced myself awake.
"Come on, Audrey, let's go to the bathroom."
She had not-so-neatly already removed her pullup there. It was on the floor, along with the fluffy pink tutu that I had brought back for her from France last summer, now soiled, along with the soiled bath mat, footsie pajamas, tile floor and the toilet. It was going to be a big cleanup. Why must she always insist on sleeping in that tutu?...
:-(
Then, I felt a light tap on my shoulder, and I heard my daughter, in her little girl voice, say, "Ew." Before I even opened my eyes, I knew that "Ew" could only mean one thing: she made a messy caca in her pullup.
What time is it? I squinted to see my clock. 5am. I forced myself awake.
"Come on, Audrey, let's go to the bathroom."
She had not-so-neatly already removed her pullup there. It was on the floor, along with the fluffy pink tutu that I had brought back for her from France last summer, now soiled, along with the soiled bath mat, footsie pajamas, tile floor and the toilet. It was going to be a big cleanup. Why must she always insist on sleeping in that tutu?...
:-(
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
Reading Between the Lines
A word on the conclusion of my last blog post, with your permission, gentle reader, before I get started on the new one. Many people mistakenly think that Horatio Alger, Jr. wrote about immigrants who worked hard and became successful, and I didn't want to promulgate that falsehood. Immigrants were not his subject matter. He wrote about American people (men or boys) who started out with nothing, and by sheer hard work, determination, intelligence and honesty, turned their lives around. He wrote what amount to morality tales (see Ragged Dick, for example) about these simple values and how anyone who sticks to them can flourish and thrive. My mother calls me "the eternal optimist," but I'd like to believe that these are among the only values required for success. Of course, women like me know that it is nearly impossible for working mothers to reach their professional goals because of the time and financial burdens of childcare, but I would like to think that politics, "playing" people, and strategy are of lesser importance, or of no importance at all. Hence I will never seek a position in public office!
And now, on to this post's subject. Last month, I mentioned the fabulous new Broadway play, "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time." A friend told me that the (rather cumbersome) title of the original book came from a line in a Sherlock Holmes short story, "Silver Blaze." This lead us to talk about Agatha Christie, and her indomitable hero, Hercule Poirot. My friend posited that by the final Poirot novels, it was evident that Christie had tired of writing about him. He said that you could tell by the writing.
I said, "I know exactly what you mean. I feel as though Alexander McCall Smith was sorry that he had his heroine in The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency books, Precious Ramotswe, adopt two children, because he never has any idea what to do with them, and basically writes them out of nearly every story." My friend was surprised that the author of these mystery novels is a man, because he writes women so well, and I would agree, with the exception of the subject of motherhood, which McCall Smith has no idea how to write about.
While I would definitely recommend any book or story by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Agatha Christie or Alexander McCall Smith, especially to someone who enjoys mysteries, I am reminded of two books that I read (or rather "listened to") recently that I would not recommend. My preference is generally for non-fiction, so I had high hopes for these two memoirs: Yes, Please by Amy Poehler, and Seriously, I'm Kidding by Ellen Degeneres, but, in "reading between the lines," I felt that in both cases, the authors were told by their agents, "Listen, you're at the height of your popularity. Now is a time to write a book. All your fans will buy it. It's a new way to make money." So, they were talked into it, and signed a contract with a publisher, and then, when they got down to the hard work, realized that they didn't want to do it after all. Writing was too hard, too time-consuming, too lonely. So, they tried to get out of their contracts. But they found that they couldn't - well, not without great expense. So, they begrudgingly wrote their memoirs. (This is pure conjecture, mind you.) They filled the pages with anecdotes, musings, and remembrances. There were a few interesting tid-bits in each of them. But for the most part, both of these books just screamed at me, "I have to write this damn book, so I'm writing it just to write it." I could not really see past the greed. I fear that even Alexander McCall Smith may have a contract to turn out a Precious Ramotswe book every summer, because I'm reading the newest one, and it's striking me as rather itinerant. But maybe it's just that my eternal optimism is waning with age...
And now, on to this post's subject. Last month, I mentioned the fabulous new Broadway play, "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time." A friend told me that the (rather cumbersome) title of the original book came from a line in a Sherlock Holmes short story, "Silver Blaze." This lead us to talk about Agatha Christie, and her indomitable hero, Hercule Poirot. My friend posited that by the final Poirot novels, it was evident that Christie had tired of writing about him. He said that you could tell by the writing.
I said, "I know exactly what you mean. I feel as though Alexander McCall Smith was sorry that he had his heroine in The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency books, Precious Ramotswe, adopt two children, because he never has any idea what to do with them, and basically writes them out of nearly every story." My friend was surprised that the author of these mystery novels is a man, because he writes women so well, and I would agree, with the exception of the subject of motherhood, which McCall Smith has no idea how to write about.
While I would definitely recommend any book or story by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Agatha Christie or Alexander McCall Smith, especially to someone who enjoys mysteries, I am reminded of two books that I read (or rather "listened to") recently that I would not recommend. My preference is generally for non-fiction, so I had high hopes for these two memoirs: Yes, Please by Amy Poehler, and Seriously, I'm Kidding by Ellen Degeneres, but, in "reading between the lines," I felt that in both cases, the authors were told by their agents, "Listen, you're at the height of your popularity. Now is a time to write a book. All your fans will buy it. It's a new way to make money." So, they were talked into it, and signed a contract with a publisher, and then, when they got down to the hard work, realized that they didn't want to do it after all. Writing was too hard, too time-consuming, too lonely. So, they tried to get out of their contracts. But they found that they couldn't - well, not without great expense. So, they begrudgingly wrote their memoirs. (This is pure conjecture, mind you.) They filled the pages with anecdotes, musings, and remembrances. There were a few interesting tid-bits in each of them. But for the most part, both of these books just screamed at me, "I have to write this damn book, so I'm writing it just to write it." I could not really see past the greed. I fear that even Alexander McCall Smith may have a contract to turn out a Precious Ramotswe book every summer, because I'm reading the newest one, and it's striking me as rather itinerant. But maybe it's just that my eternal optimism is waning with age...
Monday, August 24, 2015
Hamilton - An Immigrant's Story
Broadway Musicals - My First Love
Even though my first blog post was about visual art, anyone who knows me knows that my greatest cultural love is musical theater. I couldn't write another post without it being about a Broadway show, and the greatest musical I've seen in a long time is "Hamilton."
So many seasons have gone by where, that evening in June, I sit in my living room watching the Tony Awards and realize that I haven't seen any of the nominated shows. Quite the contrast from when, before having children, I had seen literally everything. Now that I'm not working, I go into the City every second Wednesday to have lunch with an old friend and take in a matinee. What a great routine! I've see these shows, starting in May, in this order:
"Fun Home" - see photo caption on blog introduction entry.
"The Visit" - so glad I saw this final Kander & Ebb musical starring the legendary Chita Rivera before its premature closing.
"The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime" - the best new play I've seen in many years. I'm listening to the recorded book now, and have gotten a copy of the book out of the library for my 15-year-old-daughter to read - Outstanding. SEE THIS SHOW!!! I'll try to do a full post on it shortly.
"It Shoulda Been You" - It was time for a light-hearted comedy, after three rather serious shows. Tyne Daly was the perfect Jewish mother, and I admire the artistry of director David Hyde Pierce a great deal. Also glad to have caught this before it closed.
"Hamilton"
This week, I'll see "Amazing Grace," and in two weeks, "Beautiful: The Carole King Musical" (even though in principle, I'm against so-called "jukebox musicals").
Hamilton
The funny thing about my choosing which show I'll see is that I kinda just go by my gut - not really reading up on any of them until after I've seen the show. That way, I go in with a fairly open mind. I bought my full-price, partial-view ticket to "Hamilton" largely based on the President's recommendation, not knowing anything about the show other than he liked it, and it's a hot ticket.
So, I plopped into my far house left aisle seat at 2:00, and said to the guy sitting next to me, "Is your seat partial-view too?" He said, "I don't know. I work on the show and they just gave me whatever they had." I said, "Well, forgive me if I lean over to see whatever's happening on stage right! What do you do with the show?" He said, "I'm writing a book on it. Did you see it downtown?" Gulp. It was a transfer? "No," I said, "This is my first time." And then the lights dimmed, and I was immediately blown away.
At intermission, I turned back to the guy and said, wide-eyed and breathless, "Oh my God! I didn't know! I didn't know!" He said, "You didn't know it was hip-hop?" and laughed incredulously. I said, "I didn't know anything about it! It's so awesome!" Then, I interrogated him thoroughly and he good-naturedly answered all my questions. When the show was over, he said, "I'm glad you liked it. Tell your friends!" I said, "I don't think I have to. I can tell no one and it will run for years."
On the train ride home, I watched these two YouTube clips. They will give you a great idea about what the show is like if you haven't seen it yet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaSD7NY3SCo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wboCdgzLHg
I actually saw the understudy, Javier Munoz, in the title role, rather than the brilliant author and usual star player, Lin-Manuel Miranda. From the video, I actually think that Munoz is actually better in the role. But the show is so great, you can't lose either way.
Then, a week after seeing the show, it opened, and The New York Times review came out, opening with the line, "Yes, it really is that good." Ben Brantley griped about all the hype the show is getting, but confessed that it is well-deserved. People DREAM of reviews like that. Here's a link to it:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/07/theater/review-hamilton-young-rebels-changing-history-and-theater.html?_r=0
America Now
I love this tagline: "The story of America then, told by America now." Watching the hugely diverse and immensely talented cast portray those young "radicals" worked so perfectly - it was inspiring and energizing. And, I couldn't help but to think of my father. I'm pretty sure he would hate this show, not seeing the parallel to his life as an Italian immigrant who came to this country at the age of 16 in 1957. He wouldn't be able to sit through five minutes of the fast-paced rapping. But it's all there: the work ethic, the drive, the idealism. Hamilton and my dad could both be seen as Horatio Alger heroes. Bravo, Public Theater, for nurturing this show and bringing it to the masses.
Even though my first blog post was about visual art, anyone who knows me knows that my greatest cultural love is musical theater. I couldn't write another post without it being about a Broadway show, and the greatest musical I've seen in a long time is "Hamilton."
So many seasons have gone by where, that evening in June, I sit in my living room watching the Tony Awards and realize that I haven't seen any of the nominated shows. Quite the contrast from when, before having children, I had seen literally everything. Now that I'm not working, I go into the City every second Wednesday to have lunch with an old friend and take in a matinee. What a great routine! I've see these shows, starting in May, in this order:
"Fun Home" - see photo caption on blog introduction entry.
"The Visit" - so glad I saw this final Kander & Ebb musical starring the legendary Chita Rivera before its premature closing.
"The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime" - the best new play I've seen in many years. I'm listening to the recorded book now, and have gotten a copy of the book out of the library for my 15-year-old-daughter to read - Outstanding. SEE THIS SHOW!!! I'll try to do a full post on it shortly.
"It Shoulda Been You" - It was time for a light-hearted comedy, after three rather serious shows. Tyne Daly was the perfect Jewish mother, and I admire the artistry of director David Hyde Pierce a great deal. Also glad to have caught this before it closed.
"Hamilton"
This week, I'll see "Amazing Grace," and in two weeks, "Beautiful: The Carole King Musical" (even though in principle, I'm against so-called "jukebox musicals").
Hamilton
The funny thing about my choosing which show I'll see is that I kinda just go by my gut - not really reading up on any of them until after I've seen the show. That way, I go in with a fairly open mind. I bought my full-price, partial-view ticket to "Hamilton" largely based on the President's recommendation, not knowing anything about the show other than he liked it, and it's a hot ticket.
So, I plopped into my far house left aisle seat at 2:00, and said to the guy sitting next to me, "Is your seat partial-view too?" He said, "I don't know. I work on the show and they just gave me whatever they had." I said, "Well, forgive me if I lean over to see whatever's happening on stage right! What do you do with the show?" He said, "I'm writing a book on it. Did you see it downtown?" Gulp. It was a transfer? "No," I said, "This is my first time." And then the lights dimmed, and I was immediately blown away.
At intermission, I turned back to the guy and said, wide-eyed and breathless, "Oh my God! I didn't know! I didn't know!" He said, "You didn't know it was hip-hop?" and laughed incredulously. I said, "I didn't know anything about it! It's so awesome!" Then, I interrogated him thoroughly and he good-naturedly answered all my questions. When the show was over, he said, "I'm glad you liked it. Tell your friends!" I said, "I don't think I have to. I can tell no one and it will run for years."
On the train ride home, I watched these two YouTube clips. They will give you a great idea about what the show is like if you haven't seen it yet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaSD7NY3SCo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wboCdgzLHg
I actually saw the understudy, Javier Munoz, in the title role, rather than the brilliant author and usual star player, Lin-Manuel Miranda. From the video, I actually think that Munoz is actually better in the role. But the show is so great, you can't lose either way.
Then, a week after seeing the show, it opened, and The New York Times review came out, opening with the line, "Yes, it really is that good." Ben Brantley griped about all the hype the show is getting, but confessed that it is well-deserved. People DREAM of reviews like that. Here's a link to it:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/07/theater/review-hamilton-young-rebels-changing-history-and-theater.html?_r=0
America Now
I love this tagline: "The story of America then, told by America now." Watching the hugely diverse and immensely talented cast portray those young "radicals" worked so perfectly - it was inspiring and energizing. And, I couldn't help but to think of my father. I'm pretty sure he would hate this show, not seeing the parallel to his life as an Italian immigrant who came to this country at the age of 16 in 1957. He wouldn't be able to sit through five minutes of the fast-paced rapping. But it's all there: the work ethic, the drive, the idealism. Hamilton and my dad could both be seen as Horatio Alger heroes. Bravo, Public Theater, for nurturing this show and bringing it to the masses.
Monday, August 17, 2015
Van Gogh Today
Biopic
I love the new management of the Garden Theatre in downtown Princeton. Now that it's a non-profit movie house, it offers art films, National Theatre Live from London and other performing arts screenings, classic films, as well as first-run films. Here's the link if you are interested in learning more about it or becoming a member: http://princetongardentheatre.org/
Recently, an artist friend and I attended "Exhibition on Screen: Van Gogh," which we loved - see link for more info: http://www.exhibitiononscreen.com/vincent-van-gogh-a-new-way-of-seeing . The film was made in collaboration with Amsterdam's Van Gogh Museum and commemorates the 150th anniversary of the artist's death. It is a fascinating film, and left me thirsty to learn more about Van Gogh.
Biography
So, in my attic, I searched out an old volume that I've had for over twenty years, but for some reason, could never get into: "Van Gogh" by Pierre Cabanne. I tried to read it when I bought it, which I think was sometime around 1986 (when it was first published in the US; it was originally written in French in 1961) and again around 1997, when I lived in Provence and visited Van Gogh's old haunts of Arles and St. Rémy. After seeing this film, I was finally ready to read it.
As is always the case, for practical purposes, the book goes into a lot more detail than the movie does. Now, after reading the book, I feel as though I understand this master who, aside from his artwork, is best known for sensational tidbits like his madness, and for cutting off his ear and sending it to a prostitute. (In fact, he only sliced off a bit of his earlobe.) I absolutely recommend both seeing the movie and reading the book!
The book selectively quotes many of Van Gogh's hundreds of letters to his brother Théo extensively, and I am very impressed by how matter-of-factly Van Gogh wrote of and spoke of his mental illness, although he never called it such, referring to it most often as his "nervous condition" or "madness." Regarding his illness, my favorite quote from a letter is, "...I am losing the vague dread, the fear of the thing. And little by little can come to look upon madness as a disease like any other." Van Gogh was a modern thinker in many areas, not just art.
Currently Showing
To add a third dimension to my recent study of Van Gogh, I came across this article in last week's issue of The Guardian: (Sorry, but I can't figure out how to rotate the image.)
What a coincidence! A very clever person decided to curate a joint exhibition of works by the Norwegian artist Edvard Munch, who was born only ten years after Van Gogh was born, and the Dutch artist, both of whom lived in France but never met. And of course, Van Gogh died much earlier. The exhibit is currently in Oslo (where I hope to visit next summer, alas too late to see the exhibition) and then travels to Amsterdam. I never would have thought of showing them together, but in reading this article, it's surprising that they have never been shown together before!
That's all for now - Thanks for reading! Please follow my blog and comment below!
I love the new management of the Garden Theatre in downtown Princeton. Now that it's a non-profit movie house, it offers art films, National Theatre Live from London and other performing arts screenings, classic films, as well as first-run films. Here's the link if you are interested in learning more about it or becoming a member: http://princetongardentheatre.org/
Recently, an artist friend and I attended "Exhibition on Screen: Van Gogh," which we loved - see link for more info: http://www.exhibitiononscreen.com/vincent-van-gogh-a-new-way-of-seeing . The film was made in collaboration with Amsterdam's Van Gogh Museum and commemorates the 150th anniversary of the artist's death. It is a fascinating film, and left me thirsty to learn more about Van Gogh.
Biography
So, in my attic, I searched out an old volume that I've had for over twenty years, but for some reason, could never get into: "Van Gogh" by Pierre Cabanne. I tried to read it when I bought it, which I think was sometime around 1986 (when it was first published in the US; it was originally written in French in 1961) and again around 1997, when I lived in Provence and visited Van Gogh's old haunts of Arles and St. Rémy. After seeing this film, I was finally ready to read it.
As is always the case, for practical purposes, the book goes into a lot more detail than the movie does. Now, after reading the book, I feel as though I understand this master who, aside from his artwork, is best known for sensational tidbits like his madness, and for cutting off his ear and sending it to a prostitute. (In fact, he only sliced off a bit of his earlobe.) I absolutely recommend both seeing the movie and reading the book!
The book selectively quotes many of Van Gogh's hundreds of letters to his brother Théo extensively, and I am very impressed by how matter-of-factly Van Gogh wrote of and spoke of his mental illness, although he never called it such, referring to it most often as his "nervous condition" or "madness." Regarding his illness, my favorite quote from a letter is, "...I am losing the vague dread, the fear of the thing. And little by little can come to look upon madness as a disease like any other." Van Gogh was a modern thinker in many areas, not just art.
Currently Showing
To add a third dimension to my recent study of Van Gogh, I came across this article in last week's issue of The Guardian: (Sorry, but I can't figure out how to rotate the image.)
What a coincidence! A very clever person decided to curate a joint exhibition of works by the Norwegian artist Edvard Munch, who was born only ten years after Van Gogh was born, and the Dutch artist, both of whom lived in France but never met. And of course, Van Gogh died much earlier. The exhibit is currently in Oslo (where I hope to visit next summer, alas too late to see the exhibition) and then travels to Amsterdam. I never would have thought of showing them together, but in reading this article, it's surprising that they have never been shown together before!
That's all for now - Thanks for reading! Please follow my blog and comment below!
Friday, August 14, 2015
Introduction to my Blog: Cultural Impressions
Welcome to my Blog: Cultural Impressions
Being a great fan of live theater, especially musicals, cinema and books, I decided to start this blog in order to record my reactions to performances I've attended, movies I've seen, and books I've either read or listened to.
One of the most important functions of art is that it ties us all together, giving people, no matter how disparate, common ground from which discussions on the human experience can be launched.
So, please share your thoughts! Thank you for reading!
Selfie taken in front of the lockers at Circle in the Square Theatre before a performance of the 2015 Tony Award winner for Best Musical,"Fun Home," spring, 2015. I worked in Circle in the Square's marketing department as an NYU grad student in 1987-88. I visited with my friend, the star of the show and Tony Award-winner Michael Cerveris, whom I know from his days playing "Tommy" on Broadway when I was working at Dodger Productions (1993), after the show.
Being a great fan of live theater, especially musicals, cinema and books, I decided to start this blog in order to record my reactions to performances I've attended, movies I've seen, and books I've either read or listened to.
One of the most important functions of art is that it ties us all together, giving people, no matter how disparate, common ground from which discussions on the human experience can be launched.
So, please share your thoughts! Thank you for reading!
Selfie taken in front of the lockers at Circle in the Square Theatre before a performance of the 2015 Tony Award winner for Best Musical,"Fun Home," spring, 2015. I worked in Circle in the Square's marketing department as an NYU grad student in 1987-88. I visited with my friend, the star of the show and Tony Award-winner Michael Cerveris, whom I know from his days playing "Tommy" on Broadway when I was working at Dodger Productions (1993), after the show.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)